What is an “arachnid”? Consensus, consilience, and confirmation bias in the phylogenetics of chelicerata

Prashant P. Sharma, Jesús A. Ballesteros, Carlos E. Santibáñez-López

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

The basal phylogeny of Chelicerata is one of the opaquest parts of the animal Tree of Life, defying resolution despite application of thousands of loci and millions of sites. At the forefront of the debate over chelicerate relationships is the monophyly of Arachnida, which has been refuted by most analyses of molecular sequence data. A number of phylogenomic datasets have suggested that Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs) are derived arachnids, refuting the traditional understanding of arachnid monophyly. This result is regarded as controversial, not least by paleontologists and morphologists, due to the widespread perception that arachnid monophyly is unambiguously supported by morphological data. Moreover, some molecular datasets have been able to recover arachnid monophyly, galvanizing the belief that any result that challenges arachnid monophyly is artefactual. Here, we explore the problems of distinguishing phylogenetic signal from noise through a series of in silico experiments, focusing on datasets that have recently supported arachnid monophyly. We assess the claim that filtering by saturation rate is a valid criterion for recovering Arachnida. We demonstrate that neither saturation rate, nor the ability to assemble a molecular phylogenetic dataset supporting a given outcome with maximal nodal support, is a guarantor of phylogenetic accuracy. Separately, we review empirical morphological phylogenetic datasets to examine characters supporting Arachnida and the downstream implication of a single colonization of terrestrial habitats. We show that morphological support of arachnid monophyly is contingent upon a small number of ambiguous or incorrectly coded characters, most of these tautologically linked to adaptation to terrestrial habitats.

Original languageEnglish
Article number568
JournalDiversity
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021

Keywords

  • Arthropoda
  • Circular reasoning
  • Investigator bias
  • Paleontology
  • Phylogenomics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What is an “arachnid”? Consensus, consilience, and confirmation bias in the phylogenetics of chelicerata'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this