TY - CHAP
T1 - The AI Inclusion Challenge
T2 - Assessing Digital Vulnerability in AI Adoption and Usage
AU - Kim, Yeonkyung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This chapter examines the disparities in AI adoption, awareness, and perceived helpfulness between the general public and digitally vulnerable populations in South Korea. Using national survey data, the findings reveal that while the general public demonstrates higher AI usage and awareness, digitally vulnerable groups—including seniors, low-income individuals, people with disabilities, and multicultural family members—face systemic barriers to AI adoption. These barriers stem from limited AI literacy, accessibility challenges, affordability concerns, and a lack of perceived relevance, reinforcing existing digital inequalities. The study highlights the gap between AI awareness and actual usage, emphasizing that mere exposure to AI is insufficient for meaningful engagement. While AI has the potential to improve accessibility, it may also deepen digital disparities if accessibility and usability concerns are not addressed. These findings underscore the need for targeted AI policies that prioritize equitable access, AI literacy, and affordability to mitigate the risks of AI exacerbating the digital divide. Policy recommendations include AI literacy programs, culturally adaptive AI services, and measures to mitigate algorithmic bias.
AB - This chapter examines the disparities in AI adoption, awareness, and perceived helpfulness between the general public and digitally vulnerable populations in South Korea. Using national survey data, the findings reveal that while the general public demonstrates higher AI usage and awareness, digitally vulnerable groups—including seniors, low-income individuals, people with disabilities, and multicultural family members—face systemic barriers to AI adoption. These barriers stem from limited AI literacy, accessibility challenges, affordability concerns, and a lack of perceived relevance, reinforcing existing digital inequalities. The study highlights the gap between AI awareness and actual usage, emphasizing that mere exposure to AI is insufficient for meaningful engagement. While AI has the potential to improve accessibility, it may also deepen digital disparities if accessibility and usability concerns are not addressed. These findings underscore the need for targeted AI policies that prioritize equitable access, AI literacy, and affordability to mitigate the risks of AI exacerbating the digital divide. Policy recommendations include AI literacy programs, culturally adaptive AI services, and measures to mitigate algorithmic bias.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Digital divide
KW - Digital equity
KW - Digital inclusion
KW - Digital vulnerability
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019368197
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-032-00514-4_19
DO - 10.1007/978-3-032-00514-4_19
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:105019368197
T3 - Public Administration, Governance and Globalization
SP - 389
EP - 406
BT - Public Administration, Governance and Globalization
PB - Springer
ER -