TY - JOUR
T1 - Ongoing Formative Evaluation and Quality Improvement in an Interprofessional Family Support Program
AU - Friedman, Zahava L.
AU - Simon, Gianna
AU - Giordano, Keri
AU - Lee, John
AU - Garro, Adrienne
AU - Nealon, Kate
AU - Latawiec, Jessica
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The Raising Families Project delivered three, 12-week cohorts of interprofessional services alongside graduate student training, where weekly evaluation surveys provided formative data. This article examines quality improvement via ongoing formative program evaluation. The purpose of the current study was to gather and analyze Raising Families Project participant feedback relating to program delivery logistics, to improve ongoing and future program delivery and quality. A total of 347 weekly evaluation surveys were collected from caregivers (n = 37), students (n = 35), and clinicians (n = 7). Descriptive statistics and reflexive thematic analysis were utilized to analyze survey data. Five themes were developed related to quality improvement, namely immediate vs. sustained adjustments, logistical enhancements, challenging flexibility, collaborative benefits/varied meaning, revealing complexity of participants’ preferences, alongside iterative improvements resulting from feedback. Findings suggest the need to include formative evaluation, to embed the caregiver/family in interprofessional approaches, and to consider individuals’ needs in practice.
AB - The Raising Families Project delivered three, 12-week cohorts of interprofessional services alongside graduate student training, where weekly evaluation surveys provided formative data. This article examines quality improvement via ongoing formative program evaluation. The purpose of the current study was to gather and analyze Raising Families Project participant feedback relating to program delivery logistics, to improve ongoing and future program delivery and quality. A total of 347 weekly evaluation surveys were collected from caregivers (n = 37), students (n = 35), and clinicians (n = 7). Descriptive statistics and reflexive thematic analysis were utilized to analyze survey data. Five themes were developed related to quality improvement, namely immediate vs. sustained adjustments, logistical enhancements, challenging flexibility, collaborative benefits/varied meaning, revealing complexity of participants’ preferences, alongside iterative improvements resulting from feedback. Findings suggest the need to include formative evaluation, to embed the caregiver/family in interprofessional approaches, and to consider individuals’ needs in practice.
KW - formative evaluation
KW - interprofessional collaboration
KW - interprofessional education
KW - quality improvement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025256250
U2 - 10.1177/15394492251395673
DO - 10.1177/15394492251395673
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105025256250
SN - 1539-4492
JO - OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health
JF - OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health
ER -